DEVELOPING STORY…UPDATES BELOWÂ
***************************************************************************
GC School Board member Deena Hayes was in rare form this evening.
At least twice during this evening’s meeting, she brought up race, and once again, it had very little meaning on the discussion(s) at hand.
During a discussion of the Advanced Learner program this evening, Hayes said publicly that she will “reserve her vote” because she feels not enough students of color are nominated for the district’s AL program. Hayes cited an article to prove her point.
Okay, I “Google’d” her article, and here’s what I found: she quoted the Journal of Secondary Gifted Education’s Winter 2006 edition. The article is titled: A Descriptive Analysis of Referral Sources for Gifted Identification Screening by Race and Socioeconomic Status by Matthew T. McBee. Here’s the article in full text.
See this abstract of the article:
Despite vital role of the referral as the “gate-keeper process through which students become eligible for official evaluation for entry into gifted programs, it remains poorly understood. An examination of the gifted education literature reveals a paucity of research in this area. This is especially troubling and indeed surprising given the field’s well-documented struggle to identify and serve students from minority or low socioeconomic status (SES) families (e.g., Ford, 1998; Frasier, Garcia, & Passow, 1995). A relatively large amount of work has examined possible methods of fairly assessing students who are traditionally underrepresented in programs for the gifted, including assessment schemes based on dynamic assessment (Kirschenbaum, 2004), nonverbal ability tests (Naglieri & Ford, 2003), Gardner’s (1983) theory of multiple intelligences (Sarouphim, 1999), compensatory policies such as lowering IQ cutoff requirements for students from underrepresented groups (Hunsaker, 1994), and performance-based assessments (VanTassel-Baska, Johnson, & Avery, 2002). These procedures may hold great promise for identifying and serving students from these groups. However, most school districts require that a student be referred or nominated before being formally assessed for gifted program placement. Students that do not receive a referral will be unable to enter the program no matter which formal assessment procedure is used. The referral process is an obvious potential source of unfairness in the entrance process. It is essential that reliable information be made available so that current practices can be evaluated and perhaps modified.
************************************************************
Unfortunately, she was just getting started.
Next, during a discussion of the naming of the Reedy Fork area elementary school in honor of the late NASA Challenger astronaut Ronald McNair, she publicly said that she had a problem naming a school after persons who, she claims, were not going to be respected. She went all over the place, again, using the School Board as her personal agenda, from Northeast Guilford H.S. having some alleged entrenched racial issues to those living in ZIP Code 27406 versus 27410 to pointing out the conditions of several cities in which various Martin Luther King Drives cut through to allegedly shopping at local yard sales and buying “aunt jemima figurines” for her home simply where “they will be respected.”
The kicker was she quoted an article she claims “she carries around with her at all times” which discusses “if Emily and Greg are more likely to get a job than Lakisha and Jamal.”
I “Google’d” this article…here’s what I found: one site that contained a bunch of liberal hocus-pocus, mentioning Cynthia McKinney and OJ Simpson in the same breath. But I saw the footnote at the bottom of the site (scroll down to footnote “5”).
Another site came up with the same article (by a gentleman named Tim Wise), but minus the hocus-pocus liberal editorial comments.
I “google’d” the article title, and here’s what I got: it takes you to a pdf article of a 2004 study by a group of researchers from the University of Chicago’s Graduate School of Business in which they conducted a labor market study of discrimination in the workplace. By the way, this article is 42 pages long.
What is left to say about Deena Hayes? Seriously, how is a sane individual able to comment her on ongoing diatribes? She clearly doesn’t represent nor supports all children who attend Guilford County Schools. If she thinks there are serious, yet ongoing injustices to black children in GCS, what is she doing about it besides talking about it? Where are the examples? Show me the gifted black child who wasn’t promoted over the semi-gifted white child. And what is she doing to biracial children? Asian children? Latino children? Native-American children? I’m getting really sick and tired of this whole race discussion. Instead of helping to put out fires, she’s keeping them going and it is disgusting.
Your opinions, please.
***************************************************************************
UPDATE, 5/25/07, 7:52AM:
Link to News & Record Story here.
Link to FOX-8 story with video here.
Link to previous Deena Hayes coverage here and here and here.
**************************************************************************
UPDATE, 5/25/07, 9:35AM: Who is this Tim Wise, the author of one of the articles Hayes mentioned? Click here.
E.C. 🙂
Filed under: Uncategorized | 21 Comments »